You can tell when you’ve stuffed a hatchback full of ceramic tile. The rear suspension compresses. The bumper drags. The front end lifts like it’s trying to do a wheelie. It’s obvious. You’re overloading.
But try that with an RV.
Load it with furniture, appliances, and a dozen people. It sits there. You don’t feel the weight. You don’t see the sag. The chassis handles it because these machines are built to haul. But there is a limit. And if you cross it, you aren’t just uncomfortable. You’re unsafe.
The question isn’t if your rig is heavy. It’s how much more it can take before the brakes fail or the frame twists. To find that number, you need to calculate your RV cargo carrying capacity.
Here is the breakdown.
The Math Behind the Weight
Most people think payload is just “stuff.” It’s not. It’s a subtraction game. You start with the manufacturer’s hard limit and strip away everything that moves or lives in the vehicle.
The formula is simple. You need four numbers. They are all on your door jamb sticker or in your manual.
“The cargo carrying capacity definition, as outlined here, is a weight limit. For safety’s sake, the RV CCC should never be exceeded.”
Here is how you strip the numbers down to get the cargo carrying capacity (CCC).
-
Start with GVWR.
This is the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating. The absolute maximum the manufacturer says the vehicle can weigh when fully loaded.
Example: 20,000 lbs -
Subtract UVW.
This is the Unloaded Vehicle Weight. It includes the chassis, body, engine, and all fluids. Full tanks of fuel, coolant, and oil are already included in this number.
Example: 14,500 lbs -
Subtract SCWR.
This is the Sleeping Capacity Weight Rating. Manufacturers don’t trust you to count every person accurately. They use a standard multiplier.
Formula: 154 lbs x number of sleeping positions.
Example: 6 positions x 154 lbs = 924 lbs -
Subtract Propane Weight.
LP gas isn’t weightless. It adds up.
Formula: 4.2 lbs per gallon.
Example: 12 gallons x 4.2 lbs = 50.4 lbs -
Subtract Fresh Water Weight.
Water is heavy. 8.3 pounds per gallon. A full tank is a significant chunk of your payload budget.
Formula: 8.3 lbs per gallon.
Example: 25 gallons x 8.3 lbs = 207.5 lbs
Do the math.
20,000 (GVWR)
– 14,500 (UVW)
– 924 (SCWR)
– 50.4 (Propane)
– 207.5 (Water)
= 4,318.1 lbs
That 4,318.1 pounds is your RV cargo carrying capacity. That’s the money you have left for passengers, pets, luggage, and the fridge full of beer.
Exceed this. You’re playing with fire.
Finding Your Numbers
If you don’t have your manual, the manufacturer usually publishes this data. Search online. Look for “CCC” or “payload” for your specific VIN.
You can also check your door jamb sticker. It lists GVWR and UVW. If those are there, the rest is just arithmetic.
Cargo Volume vs. Weight
There’s a difference between how much you can carry and how big the stuff can be. The charts below track cubic feet of cargo space for common passenger vehicles. This isn’t payload. It’s volume. Don’t confuse the two. A small rock weighs more than a large pillow.
Acura Cargo Carrying Capacity
| Year | Model | Cargo Capacity (ft³) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | MDX | 81.5 |
| 2006 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2006 | RSX | 25.3 |
| 2006 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2006 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2007 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2007 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2007 | RDX | 60.6 |
| 2007 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2007 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2008 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2008 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2008 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2008 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2008 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2009 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2009 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2009 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2009 | TSX | 12.6 |
More Acura Specs:
* Acura GVWR
* Acura GAWR
* Acura GCWR
* Acura Curb Weight
* Acura Payload
* Acura Towing Capacity
Audi Cargo Carrying Capacity
| Year | Model | Cargo Capacity (ft³) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2006 | A4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2006 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2006 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | TT | 24.2 |
| 2007 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2007 | A4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2007 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2007 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2007 | RS4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | S6 | 13.9 |
| 2007 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2008 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2008 | A5 | 16.1 |
| 2008 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2008 | R8 | 3.5 |
| 2008 | RS4 | 13.4 |
| 2008 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2008 | S5 | 16.1 |
| 2008 | S6 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | TT | 8.8 |
| 2009 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2009 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | A5 | 16.1 |
| 2009 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2009 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2009 | R8 | 3.5 |
| 2009 | S4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | S5 | 16.1 |
| 2009 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2009 | TT | 8.8 |
More Audi Specs:
* Audi GVWR
* Audi GAWR
* Audi GCWR
* Audi Curb Weight
* Audi Payload
* Audi Towing Capacity
BMW Cargo Carrying Capacity
| Year | Model | Cargo Capacity (ft³) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Buick and Cadillac: The Luxury Volume Wars
Let’s take care of the little things first. If you’re looking for trunk space in a 2006-2009 sedan, you won’t find much. The LaCrosse and Lucerne stayed firmly in 16-17 cubic feet throughout the run. It’s big enough to hold groceries, and with the wings folded down, it could be used as a carry-on, but it won’t turn into a duffel bag full of golf clubs.
“The LaCrosse holds 16 cubic feet of cargo. Enough for a long weekend.”
The real story of the Buick range is where the space is. Rainier and Rendezvous were workhorses in disguise. The Rendezvous gives you 108.9 cubic feet. The Terraza topped the list in 2006 with 136.5 cubic feet. Then came the 2008 Enclave. It started massive at 116.2 cubic feet, down slightly from 115 in 2009, but still king among midsize luxury SUVs.
Cadillac takes a different tack. There are two levels: small cars and large trucks. CTS and DTS are modest. The CTS stayed at 12.5 cubic feet in 2006 and 2007, but increased to 13.6 in 2008 and 2009. During this time, the DTS offers a slightly more generous 18.8 cubic feet. The STS and its performance V sibling are stuck at 13.8 cubic feet. The XLR is a compact 11.6 cubic feet in both standard and V. These are grand touring cars, not mobile vans.
But then came the Escalade. If you need to move equipment to a film crew or furniture store, this is the place for you. By 2007, the standard Escalade had grown from 104.6 to 108.9 cubic feet and has remained the same ever since. The ESV (extended version) is a beast. It started at 131.6, went up to 137.4 and then stayed at that level for several years. The Escalade Hybrid’s dimensions are comparable to the 2009 SRX’s 69.5 cubic feet, which is good. It’s effective, but not by much.
EXT is a strange beast. Coupe/utility hybrid with pickup bed. It is listed in the technical data with a dash. Why? The bed and cabin are separate. You can’t put a couch in the trunk. This is a statement piece, not a practical vehicle.
Chevrolet: From Aveo to Avalanche
Chevy was everywhere in this era. Their cargo capacity reflects this chaos.
Let’s start with economy cars. Aveo is small. For 2006, it offered 42 cubic feet with the rear seats folded down (although the diagram refers to the size of the rear seats as folding capacity, or total volume, which given the small sedan’s base situation is probably folded back). Take the 2007 and 2008 Aveo 5-door hatchbacks, which were listed separately in 2007 at 42 cubic feet (which is a lot). 12.4 only. if you need to move a bike, don’t buy an Aveo sedan.
Cobalt is consistent. 13.9 cubic feet. Boring. Reliable. Boring.
Then there’s Express vans. Express cars are big. 225.1 cubic feet for every year listed (2006-2009). The internal volume does not change whether it is 1500, 2500 or 3500. This is a box with wheels. If you need to store drywall or household appliances, this is the place.
Suburban and Tahoe are family movers. Since 2007, the hit of the Suburban 1500 and 2500 has remained at 137.4 cubic feet. The Tahoe is slightly smaller at 108.9 cubic feet. The Tahoe Hybrid is comparable in size to the Tahoe.
The Traverse was introduced in 2009 with a capacity of 117.5 cubic feet. A solid entry into the mid-size SUV class.
TrailBlazer and its EXT sibling? The TrailBlazer offers 80.1 cubic feet. The TrailBlazer EXT offered 107.4 in 2006, but then switched to the standard TrailBlazer format 80.1 in 2007 and 2008.
HHR is strange The capacity of the panel version is 62.7 cubic feet. The later standard HHR was 57.7 (down from 63.1 in 2006). This is a retro wagon disguised as a van. Space-saving packaging, but not a van.
Corvette? In 2006 and 2009 we got 22.4 cubic feet and in 2007 and 2008 it dropped to 11. Why? Possibly penetration of the engine compartment or structural changes. In any case, you’re not fitting a golf set in a C6 without some contortion.
avalanche? The data says dash. Why? Like the Cadillac EXT, the bed is separate. The cabin’s trunk is small and the bed is…well, a bed. You didn’t mention cubic feet inside.
Chrysler and Dodge: Volume Kings
Chrysler and Dodge share a platform, and their cargo numbers reflect their shared DNA.
Town & Country is a family hauler. Started in 2006 with 146.7 cubic feet. By 2007 it had dropped to 144 and in 2008 and 2009 143.8. It’s still the king of minivans for space. If you have three child seats, a stroller and coolers, this is the only car that ticks all the boxes.
Pacifica? This was also a minivan (in the early days). It reached 62.7 in 2006, rose to 92.2 in 2007, but fell back to 62.7** in 2008 and 2009. The ’07 bumps can be of different fold shapes or sizes. Stick to the Town & Country if you need volume.
The PT Cruiser is a retro icon. Its capacity dropped from 92.2 cubic feet in 2006 to 62.7 in 2007 and has remained the same since then. The drop in ’07 is suspicious. Perhaps the method of measuring the folding volume of the rear seats has changed? Or does the ’06 include some weird auxiliary space? Anyway, 62.7 is a constant number for later PT Cruisers.
The 300 series is solid. 15.6 cubic feet in most years. In 2008 it rose to 17.2, but in 2009 it returned to 15.6. The 300C matches these numbers exactly. The Sebring is even smaller 11.3 to 13.6 cubic feet.
The Aspen is a full-size SUV. Capacity for all model years (including hybrid) 102.4 cubic feet. It’s basically a Tahoe with a Chrysler skin.
Now, Dodge. Ram trucks were consistent. 1500, 2500 and 3500 (if listed) have 41 cubic feet of bed space. The 2009 Ram 1500 has a dash, likely due to unspecified cab configuration variances, but the 2500 and 3500 are still 41.
The Sprinter van is truly a volume monster. The Sprinter Van 2500 had 247 in 2006, followed by 318 in 2007 and 2008.
Practical equipment from Ford
Ford dominates the midsize segment, offering a wide range of vehicles from practical compacts to large workhorses. If you’re looking for Ford Cargo Capacity Specifications, the numbers speak for themselves in terms of practicality. The full size van was kings of space. The Ford E-Class offered 256.5 cubic feet of space in 2006 and 2007, whether you chose the E150, E250 or the more powerful E350 Super Duty. In 2008 and 2009, that number dropped slightly to 230.6 cubic feet, likely due to packaging changes, but it was still quite roomy.
For those who need a pick-up truck, the cargo area of the F-series trucks is not listed in this data set. They are intended for beds, not bins. But the Ranger was small. In 2006, it had a capacity of 18.1 cubic feet. It disappeared from the list in 2007 and 2009, but reappeared in 2008 with the same 18.1 cubic feet. This is a niche player.
SUVs are at the heart of Ford. The Escape’s volume remains constant, hovering around 66 cubic feet. The hybrid version decreased slightly in 2008 (66.0 vs. 65.5), but remained mostly stable. The Expedition is larger, offering 108.2 cubic feet, while the extended EL model ups that to 130.8 cubic feet. The Explorer sits comfortably in the middle with 85.8 cubic feet of space.
The sedan is smoother. For many years, the Crown Victoria had 20.6 cubic feet of space. Fusion is smaller 15.8. Mustang? 9.7 cubic feet. It’s the small trunk of a sports car. The GT is even smaller, at 1 cubic foot. Unless you have a helmet, don’t expect too much storage.
GMC Van Legacy
GMC played it safe with the Savana line. These are essentially rebadged Chevrolets, and GMC cargo carrying capacity reflect this shared lineage. From 2006 to 2009, the Savana 1500, 2500 and 3500 models remained at 225.1 cubic feet. No changes. No updates. Pure, unadulterated volume for your business needs.
The passenger vehicles were less consistent. The Yukon dropped from 63.6 cubic feet in 2006 to 60.3 cubic feet in 2007 and has remained at that level. The capacity of the Yukon XL is approximately 45.7-45.8 cubic feet. The newcomer is Acadia. In 2007, the capacity was 19.7 cubic feet, which increased to 25.5 cubic feet in 2008 and remained there until 2009.
The Envoy held steady at 43.7 cubic feet for all four years. This is a solid mid-size option. The Canyon pickup did not list cargo space, sticking to its bed. There is also no information listed for the Sierra 1500/2500/3500 trucks, which makes sense. You can’t measure your truck by the cubic feet of the trunk.
Honda’s efficient storage space
Honda prioritized space efficiency. The CR-V was small inside but practical.From 2006 to 2008, it had 10.4 cubic feet of space. But the Civic sedan is surprisingly roomy for its class. As of 2006, there are 72 cubic feet。 In 2007, this number increased to 72.9. Then it dropped to 35.7 cubic feet in 2008 and just 11.5 cubic feet in 2009. That’s a big drop. The 2008 generation change clearly affected the sedan’s practicality.
Odyssey, the king of minivans. After 4 years, there is a capacity of 147.4 cubic feet. Continuous. Reliable. 退屈かりまします的です。 The Pilot stayed around 87 cubic feet.
Fit makes it a strong candidate. It started with 41.9 cubic feet in 2007, but it increased to 57.3 cubic feet in 2009. As a sub-compact, this means that usable space has increased significantly. The Accord was a mixed bag, starting at 12.8 in 2006, rising to 14.0 in 2007, but falling back to 11.9 in 2008 and 2009. with the new generation.
Hummer’s Niche Presence
Hummer’s cargo carrying capacity is limited by design. The H2 was a beast, but not suitable for carrying luggage. It held 30.7 cubic feet from 2006 to 2009。 H3 is similar, its volume is 29.5 cubic feet. The H3T pickup did not list space. This may be due to different methods of measuring open bed utility. The H1 Alpha had no data listed。 These vehicles are not convenience, but focus on performance
Hyundai’s Growing Pains
Hyundai was trying to catch up The Tucson held 22.7 cubic feet for all four years。 The Santa Fe increased from 30.5 in 2006 to 34.2 in 2007 and has remained at the same level. The accent rose slightly from 12.4 in 2006 to 15.9 in 2007 and remains at this level. The Azera stayed at 16.6.
The Entourage minivan offered 32.2 cubic feet of space in 2007 and 2008. The new 2009 Genesis Sedan has 15.9 cubic feet of space. There are no farms listed in the state of Veracruz. This indicates that the space for that year in this data set is not available or has not been measured.
インフィニティの究極の贅沢
Luxury does not necessarily mean space. The Infiniti QX56 is a large SUV that offers 91.7 cubic feet of year-round space. Before the 2008 FX50 replaced the FX45, the FX35 and FX45 had 64.5 cubic feet of space, but the FX45 dropped to 62.0 cubic feet. Introduced in 2008, the EX35 has a capacity of 18.6 cubic feet.
セダン is very タイトです。 The G35’s capacity increased from 7.8 cubic feet in 2006 and 2007 to 13.5 cubic feet in 2008. It then returned to 7.4 cubic feet in the G307. The M35 and M45 have a capacity of 14.9 cubic feet. In 2006, my Q45 score was 13.6. These figures suggest that sporty luxury cars are prioritizing performance over storage space.
いすゞとジャガーの少发足跡
From 2006 to 2008, Isuzu’s Ascender had a volume of 80.1 cubic feet. There is no information about the capacity of the i-280 and i-350 pickups. There is also no information for the later i-290 and i-370 models. At the same time, it seems that Isuzu has reduced passenger car sales.
Jaguar’s luxury sedans are not designed for movement. In the S model, the volume remains 28.6 cubic feet for four years. The X model is 16.0. The XJ8 and XJR models scored 16.4. The XK models are smaller, starting at 11.5 for the 2006 model, dropping to 7.1 for 2007 and 2008, and up slightly to 10.6 for 2009. The XF was introduced in 2009 with a displacement of 17.7 cubic inches. The ratio of the XK coupe and sedan is 10.6. The numbers highlight the compromises. Smooth lines mean a smaller luggage compartment.
Conclusion
When we compare Ford’s cargo volume figures with other brands, a certain pattern is observed. Trucks and vans predominate. Sedans sacrifice space for aerodynamics. SUVs offer the best balance. Data from 2006 to 2009.
Jeep space analysis
The 2006-2009 Jeep lineup offers a wide variety of useful features, but the numbers vary greatly depending on whether you’re hauling groceries or camping gear. Jeep Wrangler Unlimited has emerged as the clear volume leader during this period. For 2008 and 2009, it offers 86.8 cubic feet of cargo space. That’s a huge amount for a compact SUV platform. The standard two-door Wrangler is even more limited, with 61.2 cubic feet for both model years. If you want maximum utility without being limited by the Unlimited’s length, the Grand Cherokee and Commander offer solid mid-level options. They have been hover around 67-69 cubic feet for many years.
Patriot and Compass offer different solutions. The Patriot punches above its weight class. In 2007 and 2008 it was 62.7 cubic feet. The Compass has 53.6 cubic feet in the back, which is a little tight for a compact crossover, but plenty for the daily commute. Liberty shows some volatility. 2006 and 2007 started out strong with 69 cubic feet, but dropped to 64.2 cubic feet in 2008 and 2009. That shift suggests a change to the seat fold and interior packaging, and enthusiasts should be aware of comparing model years.
| Year | Model | Volume (cubic feet) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | commander | 68.7 |
| 2006 | Grand Cherokee | 67.4 |
| 2006 | Liberty | 69 |
| 2006 | Wrangler | 45.8 |
| 2007 | commander | 68.9 |
| 2007 | Compass | 53.6 |
| 2007 | Patriot | 62.7 |
| 2007 | Wrangler | 61.2 |
| 2008 | commander | 68.5 |
| 2008 | Compass | 53.6 |
| 2008 | Patriot | 62.7 |
| 2008 | Wrangler Unlimited | 86.8 |
| 2009 | commander | 68.5 |
| 2009 | Compass | 53.6 |
| 2009 | Patriot | 62.7 |
| 2009 | Wrangler Unlimited | 86.8 |
Kia Utility Breakdown
Kia’s long-term strategy has focused primarily on high-value crossovers and minivans. The Kia Sedona is the king of volume. It offers impressive capacity, starting at 141.5 cubic feet in 2006 and leveling off at 121.3 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008. This is minivan territory, pure and simple. If you’re looking for a smaller haulers, the 2007 and 2008 74.4 cubic feet Rondo is a great choice.
Crossovers like the Sorento and Sportage held steady at 66.4 and 66.6 cubic feet during this period. Introduced in 2009, the Borrego offers a massive 97.6 cubic feet of cargo capacity, making it a strong candidate for hauling large loads. The sedan is an area where Kia Motors lags behind. Optima and Amanti barely crack 15 cubic feet. The Rio Hatchback (Rio 5) is more practical, offering 49.6 cubic feet in 2006 and 2008, dropping to 15.8 in 2007. This is probably due to a change in rear packaging.
| Year | Model | Volume (cubic feet) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Sedona | 141.5 |
| 2006 | Sorento | 66.4 |
| 2006 | Sportage | 66.6 |
| 2006 | Rio 5 | 49.6 |
| 2007 | Rondo | 74.4 |
| 2007 | Sedona | 121.3 |
| 2007 | Sorento | 66.4 |
| 2007 | Sportage | 66.6 |
| 2008 | Rondo | 74.4 |
| 2008 | Sedona | 121.3 |
| 2008 | Sorento | 66.4 |
| 2008 | Sportage | 66.6 |
| 2009 | Borrego | 97.6 |
Land Rover Capacity Trends
Land Rover’s approach to space emphasizes versatility over raw volume. The LR3 is the best of the utility models, offering 90.3 cubic feet in both 2006 and 2007. The 2008 model oddly drops to 9.9 cubic feet, but this is an anomaly in the data and may reflect certain measurement conditions or errors in the source data for that year. By 2009 it was back to 90.3 cubic feet.
Range Rover models are even more limited. The standard Range Rover stayed at 74.9 cubic feet in 2006 and 2007, dropped to 35.1 cubic feet in 2008, and returned to 74.2 in 2009. The Range Rover Sport stayed at 71 cubic feet for the first three years, but gained significantly.39 The Range: 20 Rover Sport was first listed at #71, while the 2009 LR3 was 90.3. No, just look at the 2009 block. LR3 was 90.3. The Range Rover Sport placed 71. The LR2 entered the race in 2008 without a listed number, then in 2009 with a with 58.9 cubic feet**. This range suggests that if you need maximum space, the LR3 or the late-model Sport are the best choice.
| Year | Model | Volume (cubic feet) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | LR3 | 90.3 |
| 2006 | Range Rover | 74.9 |
| 2006 | Range Rover Sport | 71 |
| 2007 | LR3 | 90.3 |
| 2007 | Range Rover | 74.9 |
| 2007 | Range Rover Sport | 71 |
| 2008 | LR3 | 9.9 |
| 2008 | Range Rover | 35.1 |
| 2008 | Range Rover Sport | 71 |
| 2009 | LR2 | 58.9 |
| 2009 | LR3 | 90.3 |
| 2009 | Range Rover | 74.2 |
| 2009 | Range Rover Sport | 71 |
Lexus storage options
Lexus prioritizes refinement in its sedans, so trunk space is often modest. LX 470 and LX 570 are exceptions. The volume of the LX 470 is always 90.4 cubic feet. The LX 570 was introduced in 2008. There was 15.5 cubic feet of space behind the third row, which expanded to 83.1 cubic feet in 2009. This significant change suggests that the 2009 figures may include folding rear seats.
RX Series is a practical choice for cargo transportation. The RX 330 and RX 400h hold 84.7 cubic feet. In the new RX 350 (2007 and newer) this increases slightly to 85 Cubic feet, but in 2008 it decreases to an odd number of 38.3. This may indicate a different seating configuration or metrics. Mid-range luxury sedans such as ES and GS are restricted. The ES 350 offers 14.7 cubic feet. The GS 350 and GS 430 are even more compact at 12.7 Cubic feet. If you need more space, the LS 460 or LS 600h offer 18 Cubic feet.
Why Mini Cargo Capacity matters to city drivers in 2009
The 2009 Mini Cooper lineup remains a masterclass in efficient packaging, even if the numbers look small on paper. You don’t buy a Clubman to move a tree. You are buying it to store my weekend gear, a few suitcases and maybe a dog or two. This era’s Mini Cargo Capacity figures show exactly where these trade-offs lie.
The Cooper Convertible is still 21.4 cubic feet. It doesn’t matter if you fold the top down or up. The structure behind the seats is fixed, so the luggage compartment does not change much. The hardtop lost some of last year’s cubic feet, down to 24 cubic feet. It is tight. But what about the Clubman? This is the king of practicality.
“The 2009 John Cooper Works Clubman offers 32.8 cubic feet of space, making it the most versatile choice for urban adventurers.”
That 32.8 cubic feet is important. Big enough for a full set of golf clubs or two large carry-ons. A JCW hardtop is equivalent to a standard hardtop of 24 cubic feet. No extra space for performance badges. If you need volume, consider the Clubman. If you want style, consider a hardtop.
Mitsubishi Space: From sedans to off-road vehicles
Mitsubishi’s 2009 lineup shows that the brand clearly knows what it’s losing and what it’s keeping. The Raider are gone. The Endeavor is gone. You are left with a core sedans and an Outlander.
The Eclipse’s volume settles at 15.7 cubic feet. This is a sports car. It shouldn’t be a grocery getter. Galant? That’s not much else. 13.3 cubic feet. This is a sedan. Put your suitcase there. that’s it. The Lancer’s volume is still 11.6 cubic feet. small. However, it is practical for small cars.
For those looking for a volume, Outlander is the only game in town.
- Outlander (2009): 60.3 cubic feet.
Wait. In this table, 2006 is 60.3, but what about 2009? The 2006 Outlander scored 60.3. It jumps to 72.6 in the 2008 model. The 2009 Outlander is missing some of the brand’s main blocks, but based on trends, it could be similar in size to the 2008 or 2009 Legacy/Wagon. In fact, if you check the information provided, the 2009 Mitsubishi section “only” lists the Eclipse, Galant, and Lancer. Outlander was not on the 2009 list.
This is an important detail. Did Mitsubishi kill the Outlander in 2009? No, the 2008 Outlander has a volume of 72.6 cubic feet. In 2006, it was 60.3. It is strange that the data for 2009 has been omitted. But when it comes to sedans, the message is clear: volume is not the priority. The Eclipse’s 15.7 isn’t bad for a coupe. Galant’s 13.3 is average. 11.6 Lancer is small.
When I needed more space in 2009, I bought another brand. Or wait for the next generation.
Nissan Quest: 2009 Van King
Nissan’s 2009 data shows a clear difference. You have sports cars has a laughable of cargo space. The interior of the SUV is spacious. Then you have a mission.
The 350Z has a capacity of 4.1 cubic feet. You can pack your gym bag. that’s it. Introduced in 2009, the GT-R has a cubic feet of 8.8 cubic feet. It’s better, but still not suitable for road trips. Maxima’s volume is slightly reduced to 14.2 cubic feet. The Altima Hybrid received a rating of 10.1. The standard Altima is 7.4. This number is hurt. The Altima’s trunk space shrank in 2008 and stayed that way. This is a design choice. Aerodynamics before practicality.
But look at the Quest.
- 2009 Nissan Quest: 148.1 cu.ft.
This number is strange. 148.1 cubic feet. This is a minivan. It should be big. But even compared to the Armada (97.1), the Quest dwarfs compared to the rest of the Nissan lineup. Frontier and Titan have no cargo data listed, likely because their “cargo” is in the bed, and bed cargo isn’t measured the same way in closed cubic feet.
The Rogue is a new compact SUV that Nissan launched in 2008 and saw a significant drop in capacity in 2009. In 2008, it was 98 cubic feet. In 2009, it was 28.9 cubic feet. Why? The figures for 2008 have probably been derived with the seat folded. The 2009 issue may be behind the rear seats. This is a common confusion in technical documents. Be sure to check “behind rear seats” and “maximum capacity”. Rogue’s 28.9 is a tight for compact SUVs. Pathfinder holds 79.2. Murano dropped to 64.
“The 2009 Nissan Quest has 148.1 cubic feet of room, showing that minivans continue to dominate the large family hauler class.”
Pontiac’s Final Years: Production and Style
Pontiac dying in 2009. Data shows brands struggling to define themselves. The GTO is gone. The Grand Prix is shrinking is getting smaller. The Montana SV6 is a memory.
The G6 holds 14 cubic feet. This is a sedan. It’s fine. The G8 is a BMW-derived sedan with a capacity of 17.5 cubic feet. A little more space. Solstice is a roadster. 5.4 cubic feet. You can fit a jacket. That’s the limit. The Torrent SUV has a volume of 68.6 cubic feet. Very stable. It doesn’t grow. Does not shrink. It’s just… there.
The volume of the Vibe, developed with Toyota, has been slightly reduced from 54.1 cubic feet to 49.4 cubic feet. Why? Design change. Adjustments to the inner packaging. It remains one of the best small SUVs for space. The G5 is Pontiac’s entry-level sedan with a capacity of 13.9 cubic feet. Consistent. Reliable. boring.
If you need space in 2009, you can buy Torrent or Vibe. If you want style, buy Solstice or G8. Pontiac was trying to achieve two things at once. Failed.
Porsche: Small Trunks, big dreams
Porsche doesn’t care about your luggage. Data from 2009 confirm this. The 911 Carrera has 7.24 cubic feet of space. It’s smaller than a Mini Cooper hardtop. You can pack a golf bag. perhaps. If the seat is folded. But you can’t do that. The 911 does not have folding seats.
The Boxster has a volume of 9.9 cubic feet. Cayman is 14.5. Cayenne SUV? 62.5 cubic feet. It’s the only Porsche that can actually carry stuff. The Cayenne is the Cayenne. The rest are toys.
- 2009 Porsche 911 Carrera: 7.24 cu.ft.
This number is small. It’s small. This is a Porsche. you accept it. If you have kids, buy a Cayenne. You buy the 911 if you don’t. It’s simple.
Saab: 9-7X Last Stand
Saab’s 2009 product range is thin. The 9-3 reduces volume to 12.4 cubic feet. In 2008, it was 15 and its trunk had shrunk. Why? Rear seat design? The shape of the trunk? This is a sedan. Not suitable for van transport. The 9-5 has a volume of 15.9 cubic feet. Very stable. This is a wagon. Or a car. The 9-5 sedan has a large trunk. The wagon has a large trunk. The data shows 15.9. This is probably a sedan. The cart will be bigger.
The 9-7X has a volume of 80.1 cubic feet. This is a Chevrolet Trailblazer EXT with Saab badges. This is a truck. It is the only serving that can actually move furniture. The 9-2X is a Subaru Impreza wagon brand with a volume of 61.6 cubic feet. Not available after 2006.
“The 2009 Saab 9-7X offers 80.1 cubic feet of space. This is the only way to get more space out of your Saab.”
Saab is decreasing. The 9-3 gap was receding. Solid 9-5. 9-7X is the last gas
Toyota’s actual load limits (2006-2009)
Toyota doesn’t just sell cars. They sold utility. If you’re considering a used model from 2006-2009, the cargo carrying capacity data can tell you exactly how much gear you need to haul. The numbers are stark.
The 2008 Toyota Sienna has a whopping 148.9 cubic feet of space. That’s van territory. The 2009 Sienna matches that. Need something smaller but still capable? Sequoia square footage decreased slightly from 128.1 cubic feet in 2006 and 2007 to 120.8** in 2008.
Compact SUVs tell a different story. The RAV4 was stuck at 73 cubic feet across all three years (2006-2008). From 2006 to 2009, the 4Runner holds steady at 75.1. It is consistent, reliable and not particularly spacious compared to its siblings.
And Highlander. It has grown.
2006: 39.7 cubic feet
2007: 80.6 cubic feet
2008: 95.4 cubic feet (Hybrid: 94.1 cubic feet *)
That jump between 2006 and 2007 is huge. Land Cruiser followed a similar upward trend of 20.8 (2006), 90.8 (2007) and 81.7 * (2008-2009) before reaching a plateau. The 2008 drop is odd and may be due to internal packaging changes due to the migration to the J200 platform.
Hybrids suffer. The 2008 Highlander Hybrid loses over 1 cubic foot compared to the gas version. The Prius is about 14.4 feet (2007-2009), down from 16.1 in 2006. The 2007-2008 Camry Hybrid is a tight 10.6 feet.
Sedans are tight. Avalon has changed a lot. 14.4 (2006), 41.4 (2007) and back to 14.4 (2008). The peak in 2007 was a deviation or a certain corrected difference. A Camry is about 15 ft³. By 2009, Corolla had dropped from 13.6 to 12.3.
pickup truck? Tacoma and Tundra No information displayed here. Why? Because it’s a truck. You can’t measure “carrying capacity” with a sedan-style trunk. Measure the payload.
Volkswagen’s German Storage Solutions
Volkswagen has a different approach to space. Reduce “Maximum volume” and add “Precise utility”.
The 2009 Volkswagen Routan is an exception. Offers 141 cubic feet. It’s a rebadged Dodge Grand Caravan, but it belongs in the VW lineup due to its large volume. The Touareg was 71 cubic feet in both 2006 and 2009. Not much growth there.
Beetle is a fashion phenomenon, not a means of transportation.
* Convertible: 5 ft³
* Coupe: 27.1 ft³
Useless for camping gear.
Wagons rule here. The Passat Wagon is available in 61.8 ft³ (2007-2009). The 2009 Jetta Sport Wagon jumps to 66.9 ft³. Golf and Rabbit come together around 41.8-46 feet. From 2007 to 2009, the GTI matched Rabbit’s 46ft3.
The 2008 R32 offers 43.4ft. The performance is good and there is also good space.
Eos (convertible hardtop) is tight. 10.5 ft3 from 2007-2009. You shouldn’t put a kayak there.
Volvo’s boxy efficiency
The Volvo cab has a box-like shape. This is helpful.
The XC90 is a workhorse forklift.
2006: 84.9 cubic feet
2007: 85.1 cubic feet
2008-2009: 85.1 feet *
It is stable. Predictable.
V70 and XC70 are almost the same. XC70 (4WD) seats 71.4 feet (2006-2007), then 72 feet (2008-2009). V70 is 71.4 to 72.1**. Marginal profit.
V50 Smaller but more powerful. Began 62.9 Feet (2006)
